Jesus' commandment of Love, as ammended by the typical Christian.
Jesus and the scriptures said:
Love your neighbours as much as you love yourself
Partical modern-day interpretive ammendments:
UNLESS
-Your neighbour is high maintenance. After all, you've made an effort- enough is enough.
-They're pests. If you love them and they come back and start trying to smother you- well, that's not a very fair response. You shouldn't have to pay a price for the fact you might have been the only one to really show them love or attention in a long time.
-They're socially awkward. I mean, come on- if they're creepy or strange, or say some things off, you have a perfect right to pass this commandment onto someone else a little more comfortable with them. You officially aren't resposnible if that said person never comes along.
-It puts yourself at risk. If they seem erratic, had a rough past, or there is some risk they could cause you harm... you can love them from a distance, or as in the previous ammendment pass this onto someone a little less vulnerable. See ammendment to "give your lives up for them" if you have any doubts- you shouldn't put yourself at risk, you have lots of more important things to do in your life, better to help many than to risk yourself for just one, right? It isn't like God ever promised he'd take care of your friends and family if you died trying to love some silly stranger... better cover your rear in this case.
-It causes you to neglect your other responsibilities. If you take this commandment that far, nobody would EVER get anything done. Yet everyone around you is getting their work done, ministry keeps going, the world keeps turning- obviously, nobody takes this commandment THAT far and you shouldn't either. This is especially true in ministry: you can't let this commandment slow you down, because then you'd be showing less love to all the other people that count on your ministry! The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few- haven't you ever seen Star Trek? I bet they read the Bible too, and understood just this truth.
-You're opposite genders. Come on, we all know that it could be misinterpretted and you don't want to put yourself at risk. Especially if you're female! That creepy guy could misinterpret that love as ALL kinds of things... next thing you know, you'll be raped and dead in a back alley, all because of the fact you ignored this ammendment! Better to find a male to handle that situation. It isn't like there are times when you're the only one who could help, or when that person wouldn't open up to the same gender in the same way. CYOA! There's a verse for that somewhere, I'm sure.
-It puts your children at risk. I mean sure it makes for cute stories where the caring little girl went up to the homeless man and said some caring words, told him Jesus loved him, etc... but it's different when it is a REAL homeless man and YOUR child, or worse! Leave those situations to stories- or even write an imaginary one yourself about your child and some poor lost person, then send it on a chain forward- whilest keeping your little one safe from harm and making sure they know NEVER to talk to strangers. They are officially released from this commandment- Jesus loved the little children, after all, and he wouldn't want the little children to be harmed because of following his commandment, would he? (see "give your life up for them" and ammendment for "why children don't need to obey this commandment either, and how parents should protect them from it if they think they do")
-It puts any form of safety at risk, not otherwise covered in above. Safety first! There's a verse for that too, somewhere, I'm sure of it.
-You think they are taking advantage of you. Come on, if you think they are just using you what's the point? They'll just laugh and say "SUCKER- stupid Christian" later. It isn't like God intends to use that circumstance to one day break through their hardened, caloused exterior- or that you could EVER find examples in the Bible of people who have followed love to allow them to let others take advantage of them. (note- see explanation in future works as to why Jesus and Judas don't count, as well as the other 50 remaining examples from Jesus' life you might accidentaly misinterpret as him allowing others to take advantage of his love for the wrong reasons. Jesus NEVER EVER EVER let people experience his love unless they had a right heart!!! Plus, HE was the Son of God and he knew what would happen eventually because of his actions... you DON'T)
-It puts your family finances at risk. I mean come on, sure you 'love yourself' by buying food and things for yourself and your family, but Jesus didn't mean it to go THAT far. 'Love yourself' is a relative example- he just means that you should love others a LOT and do many SIMILAR things for them... not necessarily to go as far as to provide for them like you would yourself or your family. (note- see objection page to refute the argument "sacrifice means trusting God to handle yourself and your family". That's just full of crud... there's a verse for that too, I think)
-Showing love in that circumstance would be socially unacceptable, especially to other Christians of your culture/community. Yes, Jesus was socially unacceptable... well, in almost every way to the majority of the religious community of his time, but that was for THAT time during the Bible... this is a different dispensation, a different time, the Bible has stopped and there is no more revelation. Jesus had a divine point and purpose to communicate. [if this isn't enough, imagine up other creative and intelligent sounding arguments, even if they have no sound Biblical basis, to insert here] YOU don't, nor do you have his divine ability to know what you are doing is right! So, avoid the mess entirely!
Pharisees added commentaries and ammendments to the scriptures and Jesus condemned them more than any other group of his time. "Love your neighbours as you love yourself" and "love your enemies" HAVE no ammendments- the standard is Jesus Christ, whose love was unconditional. If he set no limits, why should we assume his command for us to do the same has limits?