All Adults (18 and over) MUST have legal photo identification on their persons at all times
It's the Law... now
Today my family went to Fort Jackson to try out their new water park. Turns out we couldn't get in- they've tightened security, and because my half-brother Chris did not have his driver's liscense on him we had to leave. We plan to come back later in the week. An interesting thing occurred and we learned something. The military police officer added to Chris, "And for your information sir, it is South Carolina state law that all persons over the age of eighteen must have legal photo identification on them at all times."
It was news to us- to all of us, and later to my wife. When did this happen, and HOW? It is obvious that this legislation was 'slipped in' and kept quiet- perhaps so that they could gradually make people aware, ease it in, and then start enforcing it a few years later and say "Hey, it's been a law for years now, you did not complain then..."
A Dangerous Game
It's a new world- and one I do not like. If this is where 911 is taking us then I am dialing a proverbial 911 right now! This is not the kind of world I want to live in, though Christians have predicted and seen these gradual steps coming a long time now. But think about the implications?
If you are a suspicious looking person, but they have no reason to arrest you- they ask for your ID. If you don't have it- they have a reason to arrest you.
If you look foreign- hispanic, accent, etc... they can ask for your photo ID and bring you in if you do not have it. Just for that alone.
It is now a state offense to walk outside, in public- technically even outside the door of your house- without a liscence or ID of some kind. And if you don't drive, and don't get legal ID? Then you're violating state law- you are a criminal.
Yes, they'd never enforce it that strictly to start with- they don't want an uprising. But the law is THERE- and if it stays there, years in the future they CAN choose to interpret it that way. When Social Security numbers were started, there was a great fear it would be used to identify people- that instead of a name, people would have to give a number. The president of the United States ASSURED people that social security numbers would NEVER BE USED as a means of identification. I heard about this from my Dad, and I was shocked when I realised at my tech college to take my test I had to give them my social security number... why? It identified me as the proper test taker and was used to connect the test to me. I refused to give it- I said "You aren't supposed to be using social security numbers as identification" and they replied "If you don't give it to us, you can't take the test."
What people feared, then, has happened now- and we don't really mind, most of us don't even know or care, nor do we realise the implications. One of the implications of that move now hits us with the new measures of SC with ID's- and what many do know about are the ideas of a national ID (rather than state) that people are required to have.
Security, safety and liberty, freedom can go hand in hand- but to increase one we must give up some of the other. We cannot have total security and still have true freedom. We cannot have total freedom and have true security. We also must not allow fear to be a driving force that allows us to make choices we never would have made before. If it was wrong then, what makes it right now? Look at how we interpret laws and past decisions from decades ago- and how they line up with their intention- and realise the same will likely occur with laws we pass now. Are we prepared for those consequences?
Make a Step Forward
If you are as bothered by this as I am, stand up. If you live in SC, call your representatives and make known your disatisfaction. If you do not- find out if there is such a law in YOUR state, and if there is, call. If not, then consider calling just to let them know you do not WANT such a law.
And if you aren't even in the US- well, I encourage you to consider these issues and how they effect you in your own country. Either such an issue has come up where you are, or will.
I like my country as it was before 911- I do not think that fighting terrorism justifies so dramatically changing the fabric of who we are and how we live our daily lives. What happens when photo identification is not enough? What happens when small ID implants become normal? A chip so small it looks like a bug bite when they put it in- but it tells them who you are just like an ID card. That's already being worked on, did you know it? It's only a question of when they feel the time is right to try to use circumstances to get it introduced. If it won't be tolerated now- maybe in ten years? Five years? Even one? After all we already are required by law to carry around IDs now.
-Patrick